![]() ![]() I1. parallel multigrid methods for the acceleration of the underlying flow calculations Ultimately, such a parallel optimization technique should combine the following ingredients: More precisely, this work is part of a broad research objective aimed at building efficient and robust optimization strategies for complex multi-disciplinary shape-design problems in aerodynamics. This paper describes recent achievements regarding the development of parallel multi-grid (PMG) methods and parallel genetic algorithms (PGAs) in the framework of compressible flow simulation and optimization. Wang, Nanjing Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, China Marco, INRIA Projet Sinus, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia-Antipolis Cedexī. PLENARY PAPERS Parallel multigrid solution and optimization in compressible flow simulation and design Peter Wilders, Technological University of Delft Virginia Torczon, College of William & Maryĭamien Tromeur-Dervout, University of LyonĪris Twerda, Delft University of Technology Manuel Soria, University Politecnico CatalunyaĪndreas Stathopoulous, College of William & MaryĪoyama Takashi, National Aerospace Laboratory Kenjiro Shimano, Musashi Institute of Technology Kara Schumacher Olson, Old Dominion University Nobuyuki Satofuka, Kyoto Institute of Technology John Salmon, California Institute of Technology Jacqueline Rodrigues, University of Greenwich Jacques Richard, Illinois State University, Chicago Stefan Nilsson, Chalmers University of Technology Duane Melson, NASA Langley Research CenterĮric Nielsen, NASA Langley Research Center Lois McInnes, Argonne National Laboratory Peter McCorquodale, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Leemis, College of William & Maryĭavid Lockhard, NASA Langley Research Center Paul Hovland, Argonne National LaboratoryĮleanor Jenkins, North Carolina State Universityīoris Kaludercic, Computational Dynamics Limitedĭinesh Kaushik, Argonne National Laboratory William Gropp, Argonne National Laboratory Randy Franklin, North Carolina State University Paul Fischer, Argonne National Laboratory Jean-Antoine Désideri, INRIA Boris Diskin, ICASE Mark Carpenter, NASA Langley Research CenterĮduardo D’Azevedo, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Robert Biedron, NASA Langley Research Centerĭaryl Bonhaus, NASA Langley Research Centerĭoru Caraeni, Lund Institute of Technology Satish Balay, Argonne National Laboratory Rustem Aslan, Istanbul Technical University Kyle Anderson, NASA Langley Rsearch Center Rakhim Aitbayev, University of Colorado, Boulder USA LIST OF PARTICIPANTS in Parallel CFD’99 Further details of Parallel CFD'99, as well as other conferences in this series, are available at Read more Major developments at the 1999 meeting were: (1) the effective use of as many as 2048 processors in implicit computations in CFD, (2) the acceptance that parallelism is now the 'easy part' of large-scale CFD compared to the difficulty of getting good per-node performance on the latest fast-clocked commodity processors with cache-based memory systems, (3) favorable prospects for Lattice-Boltzmann computations in CFD (especially for problems that Eulerian and even Lagrangian techniques do not handle well, such as two-phase flows and flows with exceedingly multiple-connected demains with a lot of holes in them, but even for conventional flows already handled well with the continuum-based approaches of PDEs), and (4) the nascent integration of optimization and very large-scale CFD. Contributed presentations were given by over 50 researchers representing the state of parallel CFD art and architecture from Asia, Europe, and North America. Read detailed description of updated features. Local package:GEPIA2 provides a python package for fast analysis and retrieval of the results from programs.The gene and isoform expression can also be compared with the TCGA and GTEx data. Custom data:Users can upload their own cancer RNA-Seq data to identify its molecular subtype, TCGA immune subtype, and pan-cancer subtype.Signature score:This function analyzes the prevalence of a gene signature in TCGA and GTEx samples, and provides tools such as correlation analysis and survival analysis to investigate the signature scores.Cancer subtypes:Users can select their subtype of interest for further analysis, or compare different subtypes for expression and survival.Usage of different transcripts across all cancer types can also be profiled. Isoform analysis: Users can perform all expression analyses such as survival analysis and differential analysis at the isoform level. ![]() We proudly present GEPIA2, an updated and enhanced version of GEPIA. The GEPIA server has been running for two years and processed ~280,000 analysis requests for ~110,000 users from 42 countries.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |